Baseline scenario
Same-year receipt of severance pay and iDeCo lump sum is the baseline. Other scenarios are compared against it.
Free tool
The order and method used to receive severance pay and iDeCo can change after-tax proceeds materially. Compare seven common scenarios, including the 5-year rule, 19-year rule, and annuity options.
Results
Comparing retirement allowance and iDeCo payout patterns.
Same-year receipt of severance pay and iDeCo lump sum is the baseline. Other scenarios are compared against it.
Separate-year scenarios apply overlap adjustments to the retirement income deduction when the rule is triggered.
Receiving iDeCo as an annuity can avoid lump-sum deduction conflicts while using public pension deduction capacity.
Receive severance pay and iDeCo lump sum in the same year.
Receive iDeCo at least five years before severance pay.
Apply the 5-year overlap rule to the severance-side deduction.
A long-gap scenario that avoids the 19-year overlap rule.
Apply the 19-year overlap rule to the iDeCo-side deduction.
Receive severance as a lump sum and iDeCo as annuity income.
A mixed scenario that splits iDeCo between lump sum and annuity.
It compares common severance and iDeCo receipt patterns, including same-year lump sums, iDeCo-first timing, severance-first timing, annuity receipt, and mixed lump-sum plus annuity receipt.
Under Japanese retirement income tax guidance, deduction overlap can reduce the available retirement income deduction when severance pay and iDeCo lump sums are received close together.
It shows the difference from receiving severance pay and iDeCo as same-year lump sums, which is treated as the baseline.
iDeCo lump sums can generally be received only from age 60 to 75, so scenarios outside that range are removed.
The tool includes retirement income deduction, half taxation for retirement income, public pension deductions, marginal taxation of iDeCo annuity income, and overlap adjustments. Social insurance and spouse benefits are not included.